A Lewis acid (named for the American physical chemist Gilbert N. Lewis) is a chemical species that contains an empty orbital which is capable of accepting an electron pair from a Lewis base to form a Lewis adduct. A Lewis base, then, is any species that has a filled orbital containing an electron pair which is not involved in Covalent bond but may form a dative bond with a Lewis acid to form a Lewis adduct. For example, Ammonia is a Lewis base, because it can donate its lone pair of electrons. Trimethylborane (CH3)3B is a Lewis acid as it is capable of accepting a lone pair. In a Lewis adduct, the Lewis acid and base share an electron pair furnished by the Lewis base, forming a dative bond. In the context of a specific chemical reaction between NH3 and Me3B, a lone pair from NH3 will form a dative bond with the empty orbital of Me3B to form an adduct NH3•BMe3. The terminology refers to the contributions of Gilbert N. Lewis. From p. 142: "We are inclined to think of substances as possessing acid or basic properties, without having a particular solvent in mind. It seems to me that with complete generality we may say that a basic substance is one which has a lone pair of electrons which may be used to complete the stable group of another atom, and that an acid substance is one which can employ a lone pair from another molecule in completing the stable group of one of its own atoms. In other words, the basic substance furnishes a pair of electrons for a chemical bond, the acid substance accepts such a pair."
The terms nucleophile and electrophile are sometimes interchangeable with Lewis base and Lewis acid, respectively. These terms, especially their abstract noun forms nucleophilicity and electrophilicity, emphasize the Kinetic energy aspect of reactivity, while the Lewis basicity and Lewis acidity emphasize the Thermodynamics aspect of Lewis adduct formation.
A center dot may also be used to represent a Lewis adduct, such as . Another example is boron trifluoride diethyl etherate, . In a slightly different usage, the center dot is also used to represent hydrate coordination in various crystals, as in for hydrated magnesium sulfate, irrespective of whether the water forms a dative bond with the metal.
Although there have been attempts to use computational and experimental energetic criteria to distinguish dative bonding from non-dative covalent bonds, for the most part, the distinction merely makes note of the source of the electron pair, and dative bonds, once formed, behave simply as other covalent bonds do, though they typically have considerable polar character. Moreover, in some cases (e.g., sulfoxides and amine oxides as and ), the use of the dative bond arrow is just a notational convenience for avoiding the drawing of formal charges. In general, however, the donor–acceptor bond is viewed as simply somewhere along a continuum between idealized covalent bonding and ionic bonding.
In the same vein, can be considered to be the Lewis acid in methylation reactions. However, the methyl cation never occurs as a free species in the condensed phase, and methylation reactions by reagents like CH3I take place through the simultaneous formation of a bond from the nucleophile to the carbon and cleavage of the bond between carbon and iodine (SN2 reaction). Textbooks disagree on this point: some asserting that alkyl halides are electrophiles but not Lewis acids, while others describe alkyl halides (e.g. CH3Br) as a type of Lewis acid. The IUPAC states that Lewis acids and Lewis bases react to form Lewis adducts, and defines electrophile as Lewis acids.
Many adducts violate the octet rule, such as the triiodide anion:
Some Lewis acids bind with two Lewis bases, a famous example being the formation of hexafluorosilicate:
Many metal complexes serve as Lewis acids, but usually only after dissociating a more weakly bound Lewis base, often water.
Some of the main classes of Lewis bases are:
The most common Lewis bases are anions. The strength of Lewis basicity correlates with the of the parent acid: acids with high 's give good Lewis bases. As usual, a Acid strength has a stronger conjugate base.
The strength of Lewis bases have been evaluated for various Lewis acids, such as I2, SbCl5, and BF3.Christian Laurence and Jean-François Gal "Lewis Basicity and Affinity Scales : Data and Measurement" Wiley, 2009. .
Heats of binding of various bases to BF3 | ||
Quinuclidine | N | 150 |
Triethylamine | N | 135 |
Pyridine | N | 128 |
Acetonitrile | N | 60 |
DMA | O | 112 |
DMSO | O | 105 |
THF | O | 90.4 |
Diethylether | O | 78.8 |
Acetone | O | 76.0 |
Ethylacetate | O | 75.5 |
Trimethylphosphine | P | 97.3 |
Tetrahydrothiophene | S | 51.6 |
For example, an amine will displace phosphine from the adduct with the acid BF3. In the same way, bases could be classified. For example, bases donating a lone pair from an oxygen atom are harder than bases donating through a nitrogen atom. Although the classification was never quantified it proved to be very useful in predicting the strength of adduct formation, using the key concepts that hard acid—hard base and soft acid—soft base interactions are stronger than hard acid—soft base or soft acid—hard base interactions. Later investigation of the thermodynamics of the interaction suggested that hard—hard interactions are enthalpy favored, whereas soft—soft are entropy favored.
The ECW model is a quantitative model that describes and predicts the strength of Lewis acid base interactions, −ΔH. The model assigned E and C parameters to many Lewis acids and bases. Each acid is characterized by an EA and a CA. Each base is likewise characterized by its own EB and CB. The E and C parameters refer, respectively, to the electrostatic and covalent contributions to the strength of the bonds that the acid and base will form. The equation is
The W term represents a constant energy contribution for acid–base reaction such as the cleavage of a dimeric acid or base. The equation predicts reversal of acids and base strengths. The graphical presentations of the equation show that there is no single order of Lewis base strengths or Lewis acid strengths. and that single property scales are limited to a smaller range of acids or bases.
A more modern definition of a Lewis acid is an atomic or molecular species with a localized empty atomic orbital or molecular orbital of low energy. This lowest-energy unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) can accommodate a pair of electrons.
In another comparison of Lewis and Brønsted–Lowry acidity by Brown and Kanner, 2,6-Di- tert-butylpyridine reacts to form the hydrochloride salt with HCl but does not react with BF3. This example demonstrates that steric factors, in addition to electron configuration factors, play a role in determining the strength of the interaction between the bulky di- t-butylpyridine and tiny proton.
|
|